Quote from: D on February 17, 2006, 03:37:54 am
The percentage was far lower in the NES/SMS/SNES/TG16/GEN days than during the PSX-and-beyond era. I would say 40% of the games during that time were utter shit with no redeeming value at all, as opposed to 85% in modern times.
Even the Dreamcast, as much as I would love to romanticize it, had about the same ratio of good to shitty games as any other system of its generation.
Even the Dreamcast, as much as I would love to romanticize it, had about the same ratio of good to shitty games as any other system of its generation.
I would say it was rather the other way around. nes+sms had a lot of shitty games. it was hard to avoid them bacause i had no experience in choosing good games, no proper magazines, no internet.
as for dreamcast: there were just so few games on it compared to other big systems (even to neo geo) the chance of bad games appearing there was really small.
nowdays the games quality improved imho. sure there re black sheeps (e.g. matrix) but overall it got much better compared to 15 years ago.