+  RHDN Forum Archive
|-+  Romhacking
| |-+  General Romhacking
| | |-+  Should we include these Hacks in the archive?
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
Poll
Question:
Total Voters:

Author Topic: Should we include these Hacks in the archive?  (Read 2800 times)
deespence2929
Guest
« Reply #45 on: December 06, 2006, 04:47:27 pm »
I will get them resubmitted probably by tonight.
RedComet
Guest
« Reply #46 on: December 06, 2006, 06:39:10 pm »
Here's the description you submitted if it helps any. Smiley

Quote
These 3 patches will replace Richter with new sprites.

The Trevor patch let's you play as Trevor Belmont.  It also decensors the blood in the death sequence and gives him his bone boomerang sub-weapon from SOTN. This patch was created by Thaddeus.

The Drac32x patch replaces Richter with the unnamed villian from the cancelled Sega 32X Castlevania game. Little is known of this character as only one official sprite exists. This patch also decensors the blood in the death sequence. This patch was created by Thaddeus.

The Stylish Richter patch changes Richters outfit with his secret outfit from the Sega Saturn port of Castlevania : SOTN. That outfit was modelled after the outfit he wears in the games official artwork.
Moulinoski
Guest
« Reply #47 on: December 06, 2006, 07:22:54 pm »
Ah man... I wanted to add something in regards to what someone posted about a person taking 30 hours to do a graphics hack...

I spent like three days hacking Link (Link's Awakening) to Pikachu. I did it so my sister would play Link's Awakening... Alas, it sits on my hard drive eating virtual dust. >_>

I would've voted yes for these hacks seeing as they were of good taste and thought. They weren't just trying to degrade anything.
RedComet
Guest
« Reply #48 on: December 07, 2006, 06:36:44 pm »
Added. Anyone know which is the more correct verb: decensors or uncensors?
Moulinoski
Guest
« Reply #49 on: December 07, 2006, 08:56:04 pm »
Neither. According to Firefox's spell check, it hates both. It gives me this:

De censors and uncensored
and for the De censors one, it gives me this when the "D" is lower case:
uncensored, censorships, and censors.

However, Firefox doesn't mark t3h as being wrong. Cheesy LOL

I find decensors sounds better.
Aerdan
Guest
« Reply #50 on: December 07, 2006, 09:07:14 pm »
'Uncensors' is more appropriate. De- reminds me of things like decompression, where you're not actually *changing* the content. Un- makes me think of undoing something, which is what you're doing when you uncensor something.
deespence2929
Guest
« Reply #51 on: December 09, 2006, 04:58:00 am »
Quote from: Moulinoski on December 06, 2006, 07:22:54 pm
Ah man... I wanted to add something in regards to what someone posted about a person taking 30 hours to do a graphics hack...

I spent like three days hacking Link (Link's Awakening) to Pikachu. I did it so my sister would play Link's Awakening... Alas, it sits on my hard drive eating virtual dust. >_>

I would've voted yes for these hacks seeing as they were of good taste and thought. They weren't just trying to degrade anything.

You can always make yourself a geocities website and host it there, then link it up when this site gets a submit link thing going.
Lenophis
Guest
« Reply #52 on: December 09, 2006, 02:30:28 pm »
I'm glad you bumped this, so now I feel less guilty about it.

*watches as the floodgates open*

I can already see the backlash of this, there's going to be a fuckton of arguments about which hacks should earn exemptions now. Oh, and if it isn't clear, I voted "no" on the matter. Your presentation of why, and how many times you've tried to dictate the thread only reiterate why I voted no.

Maybe it's just me, but I have a bad feeling about where this is going to go.
deespence2929
Guest
« Reply #53 on: December 09, 2006, 08:03:10 pm »
Quote from: Nightcrawler on December 06, 2006, 09:40:56 pm

You are paranoid. Tongue
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]  


Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC